INTERNAL AI REVIEW SUMMARY AND AUTHOR RESPONSES
9 November 2026 — release candidate 0.1

These are independent AI assessments, not human peer review, formal proof-
assistant certification, external endorsement or confirmed priority. Full local
review records are retained separately from the proposed public package.

OVERLAP REVIEW
Decision: focused addendum associated with Acquirable Predictive Models.
The exact RF carrier-risk results are absent from companion v0.2.5, whose
reset-origin objectives and costs differ. Structural RF criterion and the
predecessor's same diamond/support-freeze and generic risk warnings are inherited.
Response: explicit attribution; broad oracle/amplification material omitted;
frontier tables confined to supporting appendix; no competing companion version.

PROOF REVIEW
A fresh exact implementation verified five N5 primal/dual certificates and
every component's conditional suffix risk. Independent reconstruction checked
all 85 conditional realization rows. Exact all-reachable recurrences verified
the stated N5/N6 per-depth risk maxima. Older 42 certificates and 13 frontier
segments passed a separately labeled inherited-checker rerun. Public verify.py
additionally recomputes each displayed supporting dual directly.
No supported major mathematical objection was found in the inspected draft.

HOSTILE REVIEW AND REPAIRS
H1. Portable verifier output-path precedence would fail on its final write.
Response: parenthesized the path before write_text; command rerun completed
successfully and saved all five exact verification results. Closed by executable
check and hostile reviewer readback.

H2/M1. Strict raw PPR core means failure includes equality at the crossing.
Response: changed Ville wording to "reaching or exceeding". Patch succeeded.

H3. Survivor observation law is undefined when beta=1.
Response: stated rho=1 separately, with no survivor law; such commits are
infeasible at alpha<1. Patch succeeded.

H4. The same diamond and query library must be explicitly attributed.
Response: added direct reference to predecessor subsection "A noiseless RF
example and an explicit noisy lift". Patch succeeded.

H5/M2. A violating root-mixture component alone does not prove public-history
HC infeasibility of the mixture.
Response: justified the episode-only optimum's infeasibility by its value
strictly below the certified full-HC lower bound, while retaining component
risk only as a seed-aware observation. Patch succeeded.

FINAL READBACK AND CLOSURE
Independent proof and hostile reviewers reread the repaired passages and closed
H2-H5/M1-M2 against source SHA256:
dc3e2a4d161e3ccac86ccd22a8b838f33bc526430929ac4abb1008062f26e7cd.
No supported major mathematical objection remains within the stated scope.
The initial unsuccessful readback was not counted as review; closure refers
to the subsequent completed readbacks. Full input-specific records are retained
privately. The local PDF was then compiled, references resolved, and all eight
rendered pages individually inspected. No equation/table clipping was found.

RELEASE RECOMMENDATION
Ready for central editorial review as a technical addendum linked to Acquirable
Predictive Models, with a cross-reference from Diagnosing While Repairing.
No competing broad manuscript is recommended. This is internal AI review, not
human peer review, physical validation or priority clearance. Publication and
authorship approval remain separate. No public website action was performed.