RESPONSES TO INDEPENDENT AI REVIEWS
Version 1.0 closeout, 9 November 2026

Two fresh review roles separately audited the completed manuscript. No supported
major mathematical objection was reported. These are AI reviews, not human peer
review, priority certification or authorization to publish.

P1: Evidence description conflated model reconstruction routes.
Response: corrected Section7. Row-one models are rebuilt from facet and anchor
generators; row-zero actual links and integral quotients are rebuilt from the
recorded strict orders. The distinction is retained in reproducibility notes.

H1: Require exact frozen-parent dependency and classical attribution.
Response: Section1 and this source ledger identify v0.5 and its archive hash.
Moore spaces, order homotopies, obstruction complexes, relative-torsion warnings
and prior general poset spectral sequences are attributed explicitly.

H2: Prevent q0 scope inflation.
Response: Theorem6.1 assumes the entire exclusive graph is one K2,2 plus isolated
exclusive vertices, permits nontrivial d1, and excludes larger connected graphs
and several nontrivial components. No acyclic-triple assumption is imported.

H3: Distinguish compact versus generic counts.
Response: Section5 explicitly separates 35-state RP2 /66worlds from generic
k=2 /59states /114worlds. No global minimality is claimed.

H4: Preserve actual integral inclusion maps and primitive source normalization.
Response: Lemma3.1 proves literal diagram equality. Section4 uses integral
acyclicity of (J,Y) and the isomorphism H3(T,Y)->H1(V), then the actual pair
connecting homomorphism. Signed cycles and duals provide finite certificates.

H5: Do not infer contractibility from acyclicity or neutral refinement from
coarse retractions.
Response: explicit order homotopies contract Q. Section3 explains why these maps
do not preserve availability. The refined conclusion is about homology only.

H6: Preserve interpretation/review/priority limits.
Response: abstract and Section7 label internal AI assistance, no human peer
review or confirmed priority, and no physical/cognitive/architecture conclusion.

M1: Explicitly retain human specialist-review recommendation.
Response: final limits paragraph now recommends specialist human review before
describing the exact specialization as externally vetted.

M2: Make covering map explicit.
Response: Section4 now states u_j -> v_(j mod3), allowing the mapping cylinder
to be checked directly against the facet list.

Typesetting diagnostic: first compilation found a split/alignment-tab error.
Response: changed the four-column display to aligned; later builds succeeded.
Second pass resolved all references. All seven final pages were rendered with
Poppler and visually inspected. No overfull boxes, unresolved references,
clipped content or missing mathematical glyphs were observed. One harmless
underfull bibliography paragraph remains.

No new mathematical claims were added after the reviews. Responses address the
requested minor edits; final source/PDF hashes are given in the public manifest.
