WEBVTT

00:00:00.250 --> 00:00:03.848
Our original cards use X for dot and Y for stripe.

00:00:04.257 --> 00:00:08.074
A has only a dot, B both, C only a stripe, and

00:00:08.085 --> 00:00:09.021
D neither.

00:00:09.293 --> 00:00:12.355
The two-bit annotations follow X,Y order.

00:00:12.875 --> 00:00:18.203
Selecting just one question keeps only that answer in the selected description;

00:00:18.409 --> 00:00:21.323
it leaves the complete card unchanged.

00:00:22.274 --> 00:00:25.649
Observe only X on our four valuations.

00:00:26.279 --> 00:00:31.151
A and B share the selected description true; C and D share

00:00:31.151 --> 00:00:33.304
the selected description false.

00:00:33.769 --> 00:00:38.610
The complete states still differ, but the chosen description groups them into

00:00:38.620 --> 00:00:40.400
two equivalence classes.

00:00:41.388 --> 00:00:46.676
An equivalence class collects points related by this equality of descriptions.

00:00:47.230 --> 00:00:50.372
Classes do not overlap and cover the carrier.

00:00:50.847 --> 00:00:55.807
Replacing each class by one label is a later operation; today we

00:00:55.817 --> 00:00:57.868
keep track of the grouping itself.

00:00:59.021 --> 00:01:01.653
Now select both X and Y.

00:01:02.171 --> 00:01:07.596
Instead of grouping equal descriptions, collect the selected formulas true at each

00:01:07.607 --> 00:01:08.178
point.

00:01:08.565 --> 00:01:11.364
This collection is its positive support.

00:01:11.778 --> 00:01:17.020
D has none, A has only X, C has only Y, and

00:01:17.030 --> 00:01:18.095
B has both.

00:01:18.618 --> 00:01:24.086
Here each formula occurs once; later we will use position labels when

00:01:24.086 --> 00:01:27.016
a selected list can repeat a formula.

00:01:27.975 --> 00:01:33.433
The description containing X is included in the description containing X and

00:01:33.487 --> 00:01:33.911
Y.

00:01:34.434 --> 00:01:38.914
Every positive item in the first remains present in the second.

00:01:39.464 --> 00:01:46.229
Inclusion expresses a one-way comparison, not equality between the two descriptions.

00:01:47.363 --> 00:01:52.242
Put the empty support at the bottom, the two singleton supports in

00:01:52.242 --> 00:01:55.702
the middle, and the two-item support at the top.

00:01:56.240 --> 00:02:00.343
Draw upward links only when one item is added.

00:02:00.887 --> 00:02:07.067
The diagram records inclusion, not physical or numerical distance.

00:02:07.972 --> 00:02:10.799
The two middle supports are incomparable.

00:02:11.295 --> 00:02:13.563
Each has something the other lacks.

00:02:14.172 --> 00:02:19.454
Different supports need not be comparable, so this diagram is not a

00:02:19.507 --> 00:02:25.447
single line ranking points from universally worse to universally better.

00:02:26.432 --> 00:02:28.982
Every support includes itself.

00:02:29.626 --> 00:02:34.180
A relation with this self-comparison property is called reflexive.

00:02:34.599 --> 00:02:39.048
We can record comparisons in a table: the row is the first

00:02:39.069 --> 00:02:43.023
object and the column is the proposed second object.

00:02:43.971 --> 00:02:48.345
If every item in the first support occurs in the second, and

00:02:48.399 --> 00:02:52.432
every item in the second occurs in the third, then every item

00:02:52.432 --> 00:02:54.478
in the first occurs in the third.

00:02:54.897 --> 00:02:58.143
This chaining property is called transitive.

00:02:58.829 --> 00:03:03.690
An upper set keeps every description above any description it contains.

00:03:04.294 --> 00:03:09.102
If it contains the support with X alone, it must also contain

00:03:09.102 --> 00:03:11.530
the support with both X and Y.

00:03:12.056 --> 00:03:15.857
We check this by following the inclusion links upward.

00:03:16.802 --> 00:03:22.618
An antichain is a collection of distinct supports with no containment comparison

00:03:22.640 --> 00:03:24.152
between different members.

00:03:24.738 --> 00:03:27.982
Our two middle supports form an antichain.

00:03:28.587 --> 00:03:32.927
This is different from an upper set: neither term means merely a

00:03:32.991 --> 00:03:35.424
random subset of the diagram.

00:03:36.404 --> 00:03:41.101
Under the one-test menu X, compare A with B, and then

00:03:41.133 --> 00:03:42.002
D with A.

00:03:42.611 --> 00:03:45.335
Which pair has equal descriptions?

00:03:45.974 --> 00:03:50.086
For which pair does inclusion work in just one direction?

00:04:06.747 --> 00:04:11.817
A and B have equal descriptions, so each support includes the other.

00:04:12.375 --> 00:04:17.225
D has the empty support and A has the support containing X.

00:04:17.904 --> 00:04:22.137
The empty support is included in A's support, but the reverse

00:04:22.137 --> 00:04:23.396
inclusion fails.

00:04:24.530 --> 00:04:28.350
Equality of descriptions groups points into classes.

00:04:28.994 --> 00:04:33.241
Inclusion orders the descriptions, possibly asymmetrically.

00:04:33.812 --> 00:04:39.140
Later we will prove that this inclusion direction is exactly the specialization

00:04:39.150 --> 00:04:42.354
convention used by the observation topology.
