WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.100
This overview explains how required output,

2
00:00:03.100 --> 00:00:09.700
live support, revisions, reuse, and lifecycle
narrow the choice of representation.

3
00:00:09.700 --> 00:00:15.867
Width alone cannot select a winner for callers
with different outputs and reuse obligations.

4
00:00:16.167 --> 00:00:22.500
A caller asks for the full vector of a four-input rule, starting from fresh state.

5
00:00:22.500 --> 00:00:27.933
There are sixteen assignments, and every output must be delivered in the specified order.

6
00:00:27.933 --> 00:00:32.700
Eligibility is determined by that complete requirement.

7
00:00:32.700 --> 00:00:37.900
An eligible route can use different internal representations, but it must produce all

8
00:00:37.900 --> 00:00:40.433
sixteen exact answers.

9
00:00:40.433 --> 00:00:45.333
A method that only provides one point answer has not completed this request, regardless of

10
00:00:45.333 --> 00:00:48.333
how quickly it returns.

11
00:00:48.333 --> 00:00:52.900
Now change the request to a projected count from a resident structure.

12
00:00:52.900 --> 00:00:56.900
The artifact is a number of distinct selected answers, and preparation

13
00:00:56.900 --> 00:00:58.833
may already have occurred.

14
00:00:58.833 --> 00:01:02.500
This task can have a different eligible set and cost balance from

15
00:01:02.500 --> 00:01:06.267
the fresh full-vector request.

16
00:01:06.267 --> 00:01:06.281
State the required output.

17
00:01:06.281 --> 00:01:09.100
State the required output.

18
00:01:09.100 --> 00:01:17.033
Then ask about live support, repeated queries,
revisions, exact operations and complete lifecycle costs.

19
00:01:17.033 --> 00:01:22.267
These questions narrow eligible methods
before measurement chooses among them.

20
00:01:22.267 --> 00:01:24.800
Compare two requests.

21
00:01:24.800 --> 00:01:28.900
The first asks for every output of a four-input circuit once;

22
00:01:28.900 --> 00:01:35.100
it needs an exact complete vector, and setup is charged once for one result.

23
00:01:35.100 --> 00:01:42.867
The second asks for distinct valid feature products
under many restrictions while a structure stays resident.

24
00:01:42.867 --> 00:01:51.433
It may benefit from a count-oriented representation, but
must not count auxiliary witnesses as extra products.

25
00:01:51.433 --> 00:01:55.500
Width alone cannot choose either winner.

26
00:01:55.500 --> 00:02:02.167
A reduced output, a resident artifact and a reload have different obligations.

27
00:02:02.167 --> 00:02:09.067
The current retained evidence keeps learned selectors
unpromoted and some native paths guarded.

28
00:02:09.067 --> 00:02:16.284
Use those findings as constraints on a proposal, not
as a substitute for a new caller's measurements.

29
00:02:16.284 --> 00:02:16.300
Use those findings as constraints on a proposal, not
as a substitute for a new caller's measurements.

30
00:02:16.567 --> 00:02:21.100
First decide whether a method can deliver the required exact artifact under

31
00:02:21.100 --> 00:02:24.100
the input and resource constraints.

32
00:02:24.100 --> 00:02:30.600
This is an eligibility check, not a claim about which eligible method is fastest.

33
00:02:30.600 --> 00:02:34.567
A selector may predict which eligible method is cheaper.

34
00:02:34.567 --> 00:02:40.233
That prediction has its own feature, dispatch, and possible conversion costs.

35
00:02:40.233 --> 00:02:44.733
Keep those inside the request if the caller must pay them.

36
00:02:44.733 --> 00:02:49.867
Finally, compare the actual complete task under a declared protocol.

37
00:02:49.867 --> 00:02:56.867
Eligibility, prediction accuracy, and measured performance are three separate reports.

38
00:02:56.867 --> 00:03:01.000
A correct prediction about one internal kernel need not identify

39
00:03:01.000 --> 00:03:04.800
the cheapest complete request.

40
00:03:04.800 --> 00:03:04.809
Choose eligible exact paths for the actual requested task.

41
00:03:04.809 --> 00:03:10.000
Choose eligible exact paths for the actual requested task.

42
00:03:10.000 --> 00:03:14.800
Then compare their complete costs under a matched protocol.